Requirements for publishing, ETHICS edition of "FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy. "
Article shall be executed in accordance with the requirements of publication (for Authors). are required to comply with the following rules:
1. Magazine "FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy "published articles on the fields of science: 08.00.00 - Economics; 12.00.00 - Jurisprudence, 05.13.00 Computer science, computer facilities and management; 05.18.00 Technology of food products; 05.23.00 Construction and architecture.
The article must specify the UDC, keywords (in English and Russian languages, 5-10 words or phrases), abstract (in English and Russian languages to 500 characters with spaces), a list of references (in Russian and English, about 10-15 sources are not older than 10 years old, designed in accordance with GOST 2008 7.0.5- "bibliographic references").
The magazine is indexed in international databases:EBSCO, Ulrich’s Periodicals directory, Research Bib Journal Database , GoogleScolar and the Russian-based RISC.
FES included in the list of VAK journals 2010 and 2015.
Abstracts of articles, keywords, author information and bibliographic lists are freely available on the Internet in Russian and English languages, full-text versions of the articles in the public domain or available only to subscribers.
Regularly provided information about the articles published in the prescribed form in the Russian Science Citation Index.
2. Provide information about the authors (author card)
3. It is necessary to provide a positive review of the leading scientist in scientic field or as a member of the Advisory Board, signed and stamped.
4. Provide expert opinion on the possibility of publication in the open press (expert opinion).
5. A signed offer of assignment edition exclusive rights for placing articles and author metadata in scientific databases.
Peer review and publication papers - in accordance with the ethics of the publication (See below.)
ETHICS EDITION OF "FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy. "
Ethical behavior of authors, publishers, editors, reviewers, is the basis of scientific publications. Publication Ethics was developed in accordance with the recommendations of COPE's Best Practice Guidelines and Elsevier.
1. The decision to publish
The decision to publish the edition revision takes FES led by the chief editor. This editor is responsible for deciding on the publication, regardless of nationality, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of scientific authors except in cases specified in the legislation of Russia (ex. Art. 29 paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation ), when present in the publication of the promotion of national hatred, aggression, etc., aimed at non-scientific goals.
On the editorial decision to publish is not affected advertising or other commercial revenue.
Information about the submitted manuscript is disclosed only to the author, reviewers and members of the Advisory Board of FES, that is, those who have a direct relation to the publication. Guarantees the confidentiality of submissions.
3. Conflicts of interest and complaints
In the case of conflicts of interest of its members commits editors and reviewers to report them to the chief editor and withdraw from the review article or send the manuscript to another reviewer. Peer review of the manuscript can not be used for personal purposes only and is confidential.
If you receive complaints about the manuscript and publication in the Journal Editorial Board together with the publisher takes action to resolve the conflict or unethical behavior by contact with the author, correcting publication and other appropriate measures.
4. The contribution of experts in the editorial decisions
Expert assessment is a by the scientific method for adoption by the editorial decisions and helps the author in improving the quality of the manuscript. The expert for reviewing of the manuscript must be a specialist in the field of the proposed theme of the manuscript. Review is anonymous. Applicable double "blind" peer review, which a decision on Editorial Board edition accepts. Members of Advisory Board FES may act by reviewers of manuscripts by themes corresponding to their research works.The review is sent to the authors for information. In the case of significant formal comments from reviewer manuscript is rejected or the author proposes to correct deficiencies within a reasonable time and re-submit the manuscript. Reviews and published scientific articles are stored in the editorial for 5 years, and their copies are available on request WAC.
4.1. The term of consideration of the manuscript
The manuscript imparted for review by, is regarded by the expert is not more than one month. In case of impossibility evaluation at short notice expert transmits the manuscript to the notice of exclusion itself from the process of its consideration.
Any manuscripts obtained for evaluation, should be regarded as confidential documents. Manuscripts should not be shown to third parties or to discuss with by third parties except for authorized by editor.
4.3. The standards of objectivity
Reviewers have expressed opinion concerning the author's manuscript, the relevance of the publication of its scientific innovation, contents and compliance theme bibliography, articles autonomy. This assessment should be objective, not personal criticism of the author. Opinion of the reviewer of the possibility of publishing the article must be justified
5. Responsibilities of authors
5.1. Standards research
The authors of of original research are guided by the recommendations of the authors. The manuscript should contain links to the corresponding earlier works by the author in the indicated field. Imprecise and equivocal statements in the manuscript are unethical and unacceptable behavior.
5.2. Access to data
Authors must provide access to all data needed to assessment editorial and should be ready to store the data within a reasonable time after publication.
5.3. Originality and plagiarism
Manuscripts are original, wittingly or unwittingly, plagiarism is unethical and unacceptable, which is guaranteed by the authors. In case of citing needed reference to the source citation.
5.4. Multiple or Parallel publication
The author guarantees that the manuscript submitted for only one magazine. Considered unethical presentation of manuscripts concurrently more than one magazine. Previously published work is not are sent the author for re-publication in other journals.
5.5. Confirmation sources
The author affirms that the publication used when quoting them, influenced the course of the work they presented. All additional information related to the development of ideas in discussion with others through negotiation or correspondence used only with written permission from these individuals.
The author guarantees that they made a significant contribution to the concept, structure, design or interpretation of the study. Other members of the publication recognized as having contributed to the work. The author guarantees that all co-authors included in the manuscript, seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its publication.
5.7. Conflict of interest
Author guarantees that proposed for the publication the manuscript there is no conflict between the co-authors or sources of financial support for the manuscript that all sources of financial support are disclosed.
5.8. Fundamental errors in published works
If the authors found significant errors or errors in its own published work, he shall as soon as possible notify the editor or publisher and cooperate with them in order to correct errors.